Chapter 1: Jesus becomes an impossible God
1.1: Jesus of Nazareth—the religious revolutionary martyr
In the Catholic Mass Jesus, who claimed to be the Son the Hebrew God Yahweh, is acknowledged as the lamb of God, agnus Dei. The implication seems to be that he came to Earth at the command of his Father to be a passive human sacrifice, a human lamb to the slaughter. His role was to give Yahweh satisfaction for the crime committed by the first people when they ate the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. That is the story that the nuns told us children, and the Gospel does portray him as a willing victim: My Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass from me; yet, not as I will, but as you will. (Mt 26:38).
But Jesus was no lamb. He was a learned and skilled provocateur. By claiming to be the Son of Yahweh he seriously upset the local theocrats who ultimately succeeded in getting the occupying Roman army to torture him to death. At his trial before the Sanhedrin:
Jesus was silent. Then the high priest said to him:
“I order you to tell us under oath before the living God whether you are the Messiah, the Son of God.” Jesus said to him in reply, “You have said so; But I tell you: From now on you will see ‘the Son of Man seated at the right hand of the Power’ and ‘coming on the clouds of heaven'.”
Then the high priest tore his robes and said, “He has blasphemed! What further need have we of witnesses? You have now heard the blasphemy." (Mt 26:63–65)
Blasphemy - Wikipedia
Theological fundamentalists around the world are still murdering people for what they call blasphemy.
The Gospels say Jesus was crucified and rose again on the third day. Apart from his sacrificial role the other mission attributed to him in the New Testament was the foundation of a Church:
When Jesus went into the region of Caesarea Philippi he asked his disciples, “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” They replied, “Some say John the Baptist, others Elijah, still others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” Simon Peter said in reply, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” Jesus said to him in reply, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my heavenly Father".
"And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven". Then he strictly ordered his disciples to tell no one that he was the Messiah". (Mt 16:13–20)
For the first thousand years or so of its existence the Christian Church operated as a religion, taking the scriptures at face value without asking too many theological questions. Most of these had been settled by the Councils of Nicea and Constantinople. There remained one bone of contention about the nature of the Trinity which eventually split the Church in two. We will look at that in Chapter 2. First Council of Nicea - Wikipedia
1.2: Aristotle, Aquinas and the beginning of scientific theology
Very little of the scientific, philosophical and artistic literature of ancient Greece survived the demise of the Western part of the Roman Empire. The remaining educational institutions were mainly Christian monasteries that slowly developed to become the first European universities late in the 11th century. Much of the Greek culture that had been preserved in the Eastern Empire had been translated into Arabic by the Muslims and began to seep into Europe. This created demand for the Greek originals and Latin translations. In the hands of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas, the work of Aristotle (384 – 322 bce) became the foundation for a new more rational approach to theology. Christopher Shields (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy): Aristotle, Recovery of Aristotle - Wikipedia
Thomas Aquinas (1225–1275) absorbed all this material and wrote detailed commentaries on much of it. He then produced a series of syntheses of Aristotle’s work and Christian doctrine which culminated in his Summa Theologiae. The Summa covers every aspect of Christianity: the nature of God, the damage done to humanity and the world by the original sin, and the role of the life and death of Jesus and divine grace in our salvation. Most of his work is still considered definitive in the Catholic Church and Canon law requires that it be an integral part of priestly training. Code of Canon Law, §252: The formation of clerics
1.3: Did Aristotle say our human soul is immortal?
Aristotle’s work served as the foundation of scientific education for about two thousand years from about 350 bce. His supremacy ended when Galileo Galilei and his contemporaries began to study the world by careful observation and measurement and laid the foundations of modern science. This work brought Galileo into conflict with the Church but he had reality on his side, as has been the advantage of science ever since. Galileo affair - Wikipedia
Aristotle wrote a short book, On the Soul in which he discussed life, sensation and understanding. He distinguished three types of soul, vegetative, belonging to plants, animal for creatures that sense and move, and a separate or spiritual soul for us, who now call ourselves wise people, Homo sapiens. Sensation is an essential feature of animals, but each of the senses is limited, to touch, taste, smell, sound and sight and the feelings these sensations evoke. Our minds, on the other hand, are able to deal with all these modalities and abstract ideas and imaginative fictions. Aristotle (c. 350 bce): On the Soul
Aristotle’s psychology is a study of both body and mind. In the special case of humans, however, he explores the idea that the mind might not be part of the body but separated from it, something immaterial or spiritual. He says that this makes the study of the human soul a difficult business.
The whole existence and purpose of Christianity is to redeem us from the original sin which allegedly brought work, pain and death into the world. It would be totally meaningless if we did not possess immortal souls that can exist independently of our bodies. Human souls must live without a body from the time we die until reunion of soul and body promised in Nicene Creed: We look forward to the resurrection of the dead, and to life in the world to come. Nicene Creed - Wikipedia
Reincarnation may have been the default position for many ancient cultures. Archaeologists often find human remains interred with goods for anothert life. Well before the advent of Christianity Aristotle was very interested in this question. First he seems to have disagreed. He stated that It’s clear that the soul is not separable from the body . His view changes a bit when he comes to study the human mind, the faculty of the soul by which we know and understand. Christopher Shields (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy a): Aristotle's Psychology
As with the senses, Aristotle imagines that the mind takes on the form that it is thinking of, but a difficulty arises because the mind is universal. It is tautologically true that we can think anything thinkable, and if thought is to be free, it must not be subject to any pre-existing constraints like the senses. The sense of smell is constrained to perceiving odours, but not so the mind.
The senses, although they are alive and organic, are in some way passive. in the case of mind however Aristotle introduces a new power, the active mind or agent intellect. The agent intellect is:
separate and unaffected and unmixed, being in its essence actuality’ (chôristos kai apathês kai amigês, tê ousia energeia; DA iii 5, 430a17–18) and so also ‘deathless and everlasting’ (athanaton kai aidion; DA iii 5, 430a23). Christopher Shields (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy b): The Active Mind of De Anima III 5
This passage in the De Anima has attracted an enormous amount of commentary and controversy, but Aquinas found in it what he wanted: we have an immortal soul. From this point of view, Aristotle agrees with Christianity on the fundamental point: we have an immortal spiritual soul which means we live forever. Thomas Aquinas: Commentary on Aristotle's De Anima Lectio 10: The Agent Intellect
This provides the Church with its two most powerful levers to control the faithful. First, divine judgement is the ultimate sanction; everyone goes to either Heaven or Hell in the next life and the Church is the conduit of the divine grace that gets us to heaven; second the church militant can promise all those killed, in its endless wars for hegemony, with martyrdom and immediate access to Heaven. They will also be reunited with their beloved partners, children and friends on the last day. My mother remained a faithful Catholic until her dying day secure in the belief that she would soon see her two dead children again.
1.4: The impossible God of Aquinas: pure act, absolutely simple
Aquinas found it very easy to adapt Aristotle to Christian doctrine. His major work, the Summa Theologiae is massive and comprehensive. He begins by explaining the nature and necessity of Sacra Doctrina (theology), and then presents five proofs or the existence of his subject, God (theos, Θεος), the quinque viae. His first proof is an almost verbatim copy of Aristotle’s proof for the existence of the first unmoved mover. Aquinas, true to his faith, interpreted this proof to show that God is other than the Universe. Thomas Aquinas (1962): Summa Theologiae
Aquinas then goes on to talk about the nature of God, but there is a problem:
Once we know that something exists, the next step is to know its form of existence so that we may know what it is. But since it is not possible for us to know what God is, but rather what they are not, we cannot consider the mode of God’s existence, but rather how they are not. . .. We can show how God is not by removing from them things that are not appropriate to them, like composition, motion and similar attributes. Thomas Aquinas, Summa I, 3 Proemium (Latin): On the simplicity of God
This is the famous via negativa, otherwise known as apophatic theology, or in logic and mathematics reductio ad absurdum. Aquinas concludes by showing that God is absolutely simple, omnino simplex. Aquinas, Summa, I, 3, 7: Is God altogether simple?, Apophatic theology - Wikipedia, Reductio ad absurdum - Wikipedia
From a modern point of view, the simplicity of God is in direct conflict with the idea that God is omniscient. The ancient view, drawn from Aristotle’s discussion of mind, is that intellectual knowledge, the form of knowledge appropriate to God, is a product of separation from material, that is spirituality. Aquinas argues that since God is maximally immaterial, they are maximally knowledgeable. Aquinas, Summa: I, 14, 1: Is there knowledge in God?
Our modern view of information and knowledge is exactly the opposite, visible on this page. The information I am giving to you is encoded in the material letters that you are now reading. Knowledge is physical. Rolf Landauer (1991): Information is physical
All that we know about God is encoded in sacred texts, or passed on by physical speech, or transmitted around the world in the electronic signals that constitute telecommunication. In modern terms, the omniscient God imagined by Aquinas is inconceivable, unless the Universe is the mind of God. The Universe is the physical representation of God, just as our physical brains represent our own minds and personalities.
(Revised 29 July 2024)
Back to site toc
|
Copyright:
You may copy this material freely provided only that you quote fairly and provide a link (or reference) to your source.
Notes and references
Further readingBooks
Aquinas (1962), Thomas, Summa Theologiae, Editiones Paulinae 1962 Advertenda: 'Cum Summa Theologia Divi Thomas usitatissimus in scholis theologicis evadat, saepius temporibus anteactis forma manuali edita est, ut facilius eius usus redderetur; tamen hucusque impossibile fuit editionem manualem unico volumine parare. Nunc progressus artis typographicae ad hoc optima media praebet et ideo desiderium omnium professorum at alumnorum adimplere nisi sumus, illis Summam Theologiae unico volumine, forma manuali et scholaris, cum typis maxime perspicuis, offerendo et hoc modo magno incommoda editionum in pluribus voluminis evadendo.'back |
Links
Apophatic theology - Wikipedia, Apophatic theology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'Apophatic theology (from Greek ἀπόφασις from ἀπόφημι - apophēmi, "to deny")—also known as negative theology or via negativa (Latin for "negative way")—is a theology that attempts to describe God, the Divine Good, by negation, to speak only in terms of what may not be said about the perfect goodness that is God. It stands in contrast with cataphatic theology.' back |
Aquinas, Summa, I, 3, 7, Is God altogether simple?, 'I answer that, The absolute simplicity of God may be shown in many ways.
First, from the previous articles of this question. For there is neither composition of quantitative parts in God, since He is not a body; nor composition of matter and form; nor does His nature differ from His "suppositum"; nor His essence from His existence; neither is there in Him composition of genus and difference, nor of subject and accident. Therefore, it is clear that God is nowise composite, but is altogether simple. . . . ' back |
Aquinas, Summa: I, 14, 1, Is there knowledge in God?, ' I answer that, In God there exists the most perfect knowledge. . . . it is clear that the immateriality of a thing is the reason why it is cognitive; and according to the mode of immateriality is the mode of knowledge. Hence it is said in De Anima ii that plants do not know, because they are wholly material. But sense is cognitive because it can receive images free from matter, and the intellect is still further cognitive, because it is more separated from matter and unmixed, as said in De Anima iii. Since therefore God is in the highest degree of immateriality as stated above (Question 7, Article 1), it follows that He occupies the highest place in knowledge.' back |
Aristotle (c. 350 bce), On the Soul, Aristotle's Psychology in Greek and English with Introduction and Notes by Edwin Wallace, MA, Fellow and Tutor of Worcester College,Oxford, Cambridge Universaity Press, 1882. back |
Blasphemy - Wikipedia, Blasphemy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' Blasphemy refers to an insult that shows contempt, disrespect or lack of reverence concerning a deity, an object considered sacred, or something considered inviolable. Some religions regard blasphemy as a crime, including insulting the Islamic prophet Muhammad in Islam, speaking the "sacred name" in Judaism, and blasphemy of the Holy Spirit is "eternal sin" in Christianity. It was also a crime under English common law.' back |
Christopher Shields (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy a), Aristotle's Psychology, ' In De Anima, Aristotle makes extensive use of technical terminology introduced and explained elsewhere in his writings. He claims, for example, using vocabulary derived from his physical and metaphysical theories, that the soul is a “first actuality of a natural organic body” (De Anima ii 1, 412b5–6), that it is a “substance as form of a natural body which has life in potentiality” (De Anima ii 1, 412a20–1) and, similarly, that it “is a first actuality of a natural body which has life in potentiality” (De Anima ii 1, 412a27–8), all claims which apply to plants, animals and humans alike.' back |
Christopher Shields (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy b), The Active Mind of De Anima III 5 , ' After characterizingnous the mind (nous) and its activities in De Animaiii 4, Aristotle takes a surprising turn. In De Anima iii 5, he introduces an obscure and hotly disputed subject: the active mind or active intellect (nous poiêtikos). Controversy surrounds almost every aspect of De Anima iii 5, not least because in it Aristotle characterizes the active mind—a topic mentioned nowhere else in his entire corpus—as ‘separate and unaffected and unmixed, being in its essence actuality’ (chôristos kai apathês kai amigês, tê ousia energeia; DA iii 5, 430a17–18) and then also as ‘deathless and everlasting’ (athanaton kai aidion; DA iii 5, 430a23). This comes as no small surprise to readers of De Anima, because Aristotle had earlier in the same work treated the mind (nous) as but one faculty (dunamis) of the soul (psuchê), and he had contended that the soul as a whole is not separable from the body (DA ii 1, 413a3–5). back |
Christopher Shields (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), Aristotle, First published Thu Sep 25, 2008; substantive revision Tue Aug 25, 2020
'Aristotle (384–322 B.C.E.) numbers among the greatest philosophers of all time. Judged solely in terms of his philosophical influence, only Plato is his peer: . . . A prodigious researcher and writer, Aristotle left a great body of work, perhaps numbering as many as two-hundred treatises, from which approximately thirty-one survive. His extant writings span a wide range of disciplines, from logic, metaphysics and philosophy of mind, through ethics, political theory, aesthetics and rhetoric, and into such primarily non-philosophical fields as empirical biology, where he excelled at detailed plant and animal observation and taxonomy. In all these areas, Aristotle's theories have provided illumination, met with resistance, sparked debate, and generally stimulated the sustained interest of an abiding readership.' back |
Code of Canon Law, §252, The formation of clerics, ' Can. 252 §1. Theological instruction is to be imparted in the light of faith and under the leadership of the magisterium in such a way that the students understand the entire Catholic doctrine grounded in divine revelation, gain nourishment for their own spiritual life, and are able properly to announce and safeguard it in the exercise of the ministry.
§2. Students are to be instructed in sacred scripture with special diligence in such a way that they acquire a comprehensive view of the whole of sacred scripture.
§3. There are to be classes in dogmatic theology, always grounded in the written word of God together with sacred tradition; through these, students are to learn to penetrate more intimately the mysteries of salvation, especially with St. Thomas as a teacher. There are also to be classes in moral and pastoral theology, canon law, liturgy, ecclesiastical history, and other auxiliary and special disciplines, according to the norm of the prescripts of the program of priestly formation.' back |
First Council of Nicea - Wikipedia, First Council of Nicea - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' The First Council of Nicaea was a council of Christian bishops convened in Nicaea in Bithynia (present-day İznik in Turkey) by the Roman Emperor Constantine I in A.D. 325. The Council was the first effort to attain consensus in the church through an assembly representing all of Christendom.' back |
Galileo affair - Wikipedia, Galileo affair - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' The Galileo affair (Italian: il processo a Galileo Galilei) began around 1610 and culminated with the trial and condemnation of Galileo Galilei by the Roman Catholic Inquisition in 1633. Galileo was prosecuted for his support of heliocentrism, the astronomical model in which the Earth and planets revolve around the Sun at the centre of the Solar System. ' back |
Reductio ad absurdum - Wikipedia, Reductio ad absurdum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'Reductio ad absurdum (Latin: "reduction to absurdity"), also known as argumentum ad absurdum (Latin: argument to absurdity), is a common form of argument which seeks to demonstrate that a statement is true by showing that a false, untenable, or absurd result follows from its denial,[1] or in turn to demonstrate that a statement is false by showing that a false, untenable, or absurd result follows from its acceptance.' back |
Nicene Creed - Wikipedia, Nicene Creed - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' The Nicene Creed (Greek: Σύμβολον τῆς Νίκαιας, Latin: Symbolum Nicaenum) is the profession of faith or creed that is most widely used in Christian liturgy. It forms the mainstream definition of Christianity for most Christians.
It is called Nicene because, in its original form, it was adopted in the city of Nicaea (present day Iznik in Turkey) by the first ecumenical council, which met there in the year 325.
The Nicene Creed has been normative for the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Church of the East, the Oriental Orthodox churches, the Anglican Communion, and the great majority of Protestant denominations.' back |
Recovery of Aristotle - Wikipedia, Recovery of Aristotle - Wikipedia, the free encclopedia
, ' The "Recovery of Aristotle" (or Rediscovery) refers to the copying or re-translating of most of Aristotle's books (of ancient Greece), from Greek or Arabic text into Latin, during the Middle Ages, of the Latin West. The Recovery of Aristotle spanned about 100 years, from the middle 12th century into the 13th century, and copied or translated over 42 books (see: Corpus Aristotelicum), including Arabic texts from Arabic authors, where the previous Latin versions had only two books in general circulation: Categories and On Interpretation (De Interpretatione).' back |
Rolf Landauer (1991), The physical nature of information, Abstract
Physics Letters A 217 (1996) 188-193
The physical nature of information
Rolf Landauer 1 IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218. Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA
Received 9 May 1996 Communicated by V.M.Agranovich
15 July 1996
Information is inevitably tied to a physical representation and therefore to restrictions and possibilities related to the laws of physics and the parts available in the universe. Quantum mechanical superpositions of information bearing states can be used, and the real utility of that needs to be understood. Quantum parallelism in computation is one possibility and will be assessed pessimistically. The energy dissipation requirements of computation, of measurement and of the communications link are discussed. The insights gained from the analysis of computation has caused a reappraisal of the perceived wisdom in the other two fields. A concluding section speculates about the nature of the laws of physics, which are algorithms for
the handling of information, and must be executable in our real physical universe.' back |
Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Aristotle's De Anima: Lectio 10: The Agent Intellect, '743. And in line with what he said at the beginning of this book, that the soul might be separable from the body if any of its activities were proper to itself, he now concludes that the soul’s intellectual part alone is immortal and perpetual. This is what he has said in Book II, namely that this ‘kind’ of soul was separable from others as the perpetual from the mortal,—perpetual in the sense that it survives for ever, not in the sense that it always has existed; for as he shows in Book XII of the Metaphysics, forms cannot exist before their matter. The soul, then (not all of it, but only its intellectual part) will survive its matter.' back |
Thomas Aquinas, Summa I, 3 Proemium (Latin), On the simplicity of God, ' Cognito de aliquo an sit, inquirendum restat quomodo sit, ut sciatur de eo quid sit. Sed quia de Deo scire non possumus quid sit, sed quid non sit, non possumus considerare de Deo quomodo sit, sed potius quomodo non sit. Primo ergo considerandum est quomodo non sit; . . . Potest autem ostendi de Deo quomodo non sit, removendo ab eo ea quae ei non conveniunt, utpote compositionem, motum, et alia huiusmodi. Primo ergo inquiratur de simplicitate ipsius, per quam removetur ab eo compositio. . . . Circa primum quaeruntur octo. . . . Septimo, utrum sit quocumque modo compositus, vel totaliter simplex. . .' back |
|